A filter for the Internet eh? Call me cynical, but I see this as the equivalent to trying to impose OH&S laws on a war zone. The Internet is intrinsically unorganised, unregulated, unstandardised. I just
had to see how these filters would attempt to block the bad parts of the net without rendering it useless.
You can see the list of filters that the gov recommends
here.
I chose
Integard for testing because it seemed to have the most boxes ticked on the
evaluation page.
So I installed it, tried to put myself back into my twelve year old self’s mindset, and immediately began searching for porn.
I first tried the links in my toolbar, and was embarrassed to find most of them blocked. The ‘messageboards’ I sometimes visit were mostly gone. Straighdope, SomethingAwful, 4chan. Fair enough, but surprisingly Slashdot was still accessible.
Next was Google. The blocking on this seemed to be just a simple keyword filter via Google’s SafeSearch option. This filtered the results somewhat but quite a few dodgy sites get though. Once you click on them though the Integard filter kicks in and you get blocked. Euphemisms are fine though. For example, typing ‘Anorexia’ is an obvious block, but for those in the know it is known as ‘ana’. So I could get to the pro anorexia site ‘My Friend Ana’ just fine.
OK, word filtering is easy. What about Google image search? As a test I tried ‘hot guys’ with filter on and off.
Filter on: Couple of shots of Mark Wahlberg and Orlando Bloom and a few suggestive pics from gay hookup sites but generally pretty clean.
Filter off: Same shots of the superhunks but also three cocks and a crude anime of two friends, um, wrestling. A win for the filter.
A few other searches revealed (I’d changed to non gay search terms by this stage) moderate nudity but nothing that crazy. Interestingly, when you click on a naughty pic the filter blocks the page from loading, but you can still click on the picture in the google image frame at the top and it will show you the picture in full.
Seems to be working reasonable well so far. Next up P2P.
TorrentSpy – Blocked
MiniNova – Enabled, though no porn shown
PirateBay – Enabled, though you needed to log on to see ‘adult’ content.
Incidentally, as I was trying to download Tarantino’s ‘Death Proof’ via the Pirate Bay (it allowed me to download the .torrent but Azureus appeared to be blocked from downloading it, win for the filter) a pop up window appeared with a full screen add. It was advertising some stupid mobile phone service of little importance but the costs just blew me away.
The charges for this premium service were as follows. “$4.00 sign up fee plus $4.00 per msg inc. GST, Maximum 6 messages/week ($24.00 per week).” Nothing was stopping me from entering mummies phone number in that, although you did have to enter the confirmation number sent in a text message to get signed up. Probably no worse than what is in TV Week I suppose, but it does show another type of danger for Timmy twelve year old.
Wikipedia – The most obvious search terms were blocked but you could still get around it. For example, hitting the Scarification page showed me some quite disgusting pictures. Plus an external link from the page got me to a tattoo/scarification website, with embedded youtube videos of the same that I could play. Fail.
Gmail – It let me in but did weird things to the interface. I wasn’t allowed to view the spam folder, presumably because of all the crazy crap inside but I could still search the folder for specific emails. Once the search results were returned I could view the spam but not click the dodgy links inside.
Youtube – Once again I was blocked from the obvious keywords but others were let though. Searching for ‘beheading’ led me to a few infamous insurgent beheading videos (which I didn’t watch so I can’t actually confirm they were legit). I was stopped a few times by YouTube blocking what people have tagged as mature content, but you only need to sign up to see that anyway. As long as the video is not tagged with a banned keyword then you are good to go.
Well, what now? Oh yeah, proxies. A proxy is an intermediary between you and the site you are trying to visit. Most businesses use these to monitor your Internet access at work but they are also used on the net to hide what sites users are looking at. The filter can only see you browse to the proxy site, then the proxy site serves up pages to you that look like they came from it, but they actually wrap the banned sites you are trying to look at.
They can be quite sophisticated by doing things like masking the target page title and content tags (which search engines like Google uses to categorise webpages). The end result is a seemingly benign webpage sailing pass the filter that actually contains midget porn. I just did a simple test but in the end I was able to access 4chan with the filter on, and if you can access 4chan through an Internet filter it is not an Internet filter.
If after an hour I found out about using proxies (via a ‘How do I get around an Internet Filter’ Google search) then you can bet your penis enlarging spam that every 12 year old kid in the country will find out about it sooner or later.
So while chucking one of these filters on your family PC is probably a good idea, it is not a substitute for supervising your kiddies.
As a final note to the information freedom advocates out there, I understand the hesitation for any sort of Internet restriction, but I have also been on the net for quite a while and I have seen shit that would upset the stomach of a wartime morgue technician. Weird stuff you have never even thought of not only exists but has a strong user base full of punters constantly pushing the boundaries. Adults can, and do (oh God they do) what they like, but I think the kiddies need a little bit of protection from the horror that can be the Interweb.
These filters aint it though.
Labels: Internet